Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
?
EE Times-Asia > Manufacturing/Packaging
?
?
Manufacturing/Packaging??

Impact of piling on package manufacturing

Posted: 12 May 2015 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:flip chip ball grid array? FCBGA? SerDes? thermal interface material? plated-through holes?

Bigger, faster, stronger. It's not only an adage pushing athletes in professional sports. These same attributes are driving electronic flip chip ball grid array (FCBGA) packages (figure 1) to domains never before realised.

Form factors are becoming bigger to increase I/O connections for meeting signal and power integrity needs, faster to meet SerDes (Serialiser / Deserialiser) demands, and stronger to withstand reliability requirements across both automotive and commercial applications. This makes package supplier choice, assembly bill of materials (BoM) and assembly process flow quintessential prerequisites to assure first-time qualification success across various FCBGA packaging technologies.

To accomplish these performance enhancements, intriguing combinations are being constructed at the chip to package level. For example, with 28-nm silicon node designs, C4 bump pitch can be as small as 150?m. To effectively route traces throughout the organic chip carrier (or substrate), line widths can hover at 13/14 (lines/space) depending on substrate manufacturing tolerances.

Figure 1: Representative FCBGA package.

And depending on cost demands and end customer applications, routing density can impact die dimensions (in terms of x and y size, aspect ratio and thickness), core thicknesses, second level interconnect pitch, heat spreader dimensions, and assembly bill of materials (BoMs), to name a few. If these interactions are not recognised, packaging engineers are called in to develop (depending on form factor) novel solutions to combat an increased routing density aftermath.

In addition, failure to grasp a fundamental understanding of these interactions can affect high-volume manufacturing (HVM) assembly yield and package reliability. Examples of HVM yield loss can include warpage-driven effects such as:
???CTE mismatch between dissimilar materials within the package structure, where deltas in co-planarity of ball grid array (BGA) balls can affect test and surface mount (SMT) yields. See figure 2 showing warpage requirements at peak processing temperature.
???Bump shorting caused by concavity or convexity of the package

Figure 2: Package warpage at peak processing temperature (per ITRS 2012).


1???2???3?Next Page?Last Page



Article Comments - Impact of piling on package manufact...
Comments:??
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:
?
?
Webinars

Seminars

Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

?
?
Back to Top