Global Sources
EE Times AsiaWebsite
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
eeBlogs-Article content Home?/?eeBlog?/?eeBlogs
Nickname:?Jack Ganssle???? Articles(193)???? Visits(279017)???? Comments(30)???? Votes(165)???? RSS
Jack Ganssle is a lecturer and consultant specializing in embedded systems' development issues. He has been a columnist with Embedded Systems Design for over 20 years.
Blog Archive
2016?-? Apr.,?? Mar.,?? Feb.,?? Jan.??
2015?-? Oct.,?? Sep.,?? Aug.,?? Jul.,?? Jun.,?? May.,?? Apr.,?? Mar.,?? Feb.,?? Jan.??
2014?-? Dec.,?? Nov.,?? Oct.,?? Sep.,?? Aug.,?? Jul.,?? Jun.,?? May.,?? Apr.,?? Mar.,?? Feb.,?? Jan.??
View All
Comment?|?Add to Favorites

Posted: 08:18:26 PM, 24/03/2014


? ?

There is a new, free website that offers an online schematic entry tool. Check it out here. There's not much new about that, except that designs on this new site are made freely available to the public. "Sharing" is the meme today, often to excess, and offers that to those interested in electronics. As of this writing there are about 50 schematics that have been contributed.

The schematic editor is initially seeded with about 5000 components from NXP, though the press release suggests other partners will eventually be included.

Is the site is ready for prime-time? I loaded one of the site's sample circuits into the editor and the very first thing I tried was to move R3:


The result:


Or, moving L1:




Moving components gives pretty unpredictable results. Otherwise, the schematic editor worked well and was fast and intuitive though short on features. Though biased towards NXP components, for now, it does have a huge parts library. I'm sure the component-moving weirdness will be fixed. The tool produces a nice BOM. If you annotate it with Digi-Key part numbers the tool can order the parts for you. Pretty sweet.

I don't care for the logic symbols, which are all just boxes. Need some NAND gates? The symbol for a 74HC00 (quadruple two input NAND gates), here in a circuit, looks like:


That's pretty hard to follow.
The sharing is nice. However, I can't imagine using for anything other than playing, or for publishing small circuits. Most of us work on proprietary designs and simply cannot share our work.

Sometimes IP is controlled in the commercial industry with more zeal than the intelligence community uses in their secure compartmented information facilities. Even without IP issues, would you put your new pacemaker schematic in a public forum? Some eager lawyer may start looking for subtle flaws.

One must realise that the circuits contributed by the community may be brilliant bits of engineering... or not. The 450MHz mobile phone jammer is an example. It's completely illegal here in the USA, though the part number of the transistor selected makes one think the circuit was designed overseas. No doubt it works, on a good day, with carefully-selected parts at room temperature. But it sure looks unstable in frequency to me. A breathalyzer sounded like fun, but the negative input to an LM324 is unconnected:


There's no way that circuit could function. With no vetting don't trust any of the designs without doing some analysis of your own.

What do you think? Would you use an online schematic editor? Or share your designs?


Views(738) Comments(0)
Total [0] users voted ????
[Last update: 08:22:03 PM, 24/03/2014]
Have Your Say!

Bloggers Say

Got something to say? Why not share it with other engineers?

Just introduce yourself to us, we'll contact you and set you up. Yes, it's that simple!

See what engineers like you are posting on our pages.

Interviews & Viewpoints


Learn how senior executives are seeing the industry from interviews and contributed opinions.

Back to Top