Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
?
EE Times-Asia > Amplifiers/Converters
?
?
Amplifiers/Converters??

Design hits media standards wall

Posted: 16 May 2003 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:media standard? media transcoding? transcompression? wireline network? pda?

With a proliferation of terminals now on the market - mobile phones, PDAs, desktops, wireless, and wired videophones and Internet Protocol phones - designers have a choice of different voice, video, and image compression technologies, depending on the application targeted and the processing capabilities and requirements.

These voice and video compression standards produce bit streams that are structurally and semantically different. The task of ensuring interoperability among the diverse terminals with different media standards falls to network infrastructure equipment such as media gateways, content servers and videoconferencing equipment. Clearly, this more complex internetwork of competing protocols need some mechanism for media transcoding among the various voice and video standards. This mechanism is referred to as "media transcoding."

Media transcoding is the conversion of bit streams from one voice (or video) standard to another, to facilitate the interoperability of devices using different media standards. This conversion may also be referred to as "transcompression."

Media transcoding occurs at various places in the network infrastructure. Depending on the routing of a voice call or video stream, it can happen once or more often in the network. Transcoding usually takes place in mobile switching centers, media and multimedia gateways, content servers, videoconferencing equipment, and multimedia messaging servers, among others.

Transcoding is a computationally intensive process and therefore is not left to the end terminals, which in the case of mobile devices are limited by processing power and memory. Transcoding is required for pure voice as well as for voice-and-video applications, and it is needed for conversational and streaming applications.

Among the variety of contexts in which voice and video transcoding is necessary are wireless-to-PSTN and wireless-to-packet connectivity; wireless mobile to mobile/fixed voice and videoconferencing; between mobile communications on different networks.

Some researchers believe that voice and video specifications will converge into a single standard across wireless and wireline networks, eliminating the need for transcoding and giving rise to wide-scale interoperability. Although a noble goal, this is highly optimistic and even unrealistic. Next-generation networks evolve slowly and take years to deploy completely. Therefore, at any given time, a variety of old, current and emerging coding standards will have to coexist, leading to the need for media transcoding.

Wireless networks today, as a subset of all networks, use a range of different voice-coding standards, including GSM-EFR, -FR, and -HR; narrowband and wideband AMR; as well as EVRC, QCELP, and SMV. Further improvements and breakthroughs are continually emerging and becoming standardized. Convergence across wireless standards themselves is an unlikely scenario, and therefore, the possibility of convergence among wireless and wireline standards is very remote.

Transcoding technique

The most prevalent technique for media transcoding is the tandem method. While tandem transcoding is effective, this is a brute-force approach that is computationally intensive and causes excessive delays.

Tandem transcoding is deployed in different ways, depending on whether it is enlisted for voice or video.

In the case of voice, when converting from one voice standard (say, standard A) to another (standard B), the coded voice in standard A is completely decoded to pulse-code modulation and then re-encoded to standard B. In the video context, when converting from video standard A to video standard B, the coded bit stream in A is completely decoded to YUV and then re-encoded to standard B.

Although tandem transcoding is the prevalent method used in networks today, it suffers from two major drawbacks. First, the issue of large DSP resource requirement. While the decoding utilizes a small amount of MIPS, the re-encoding process in tandem transcoding requires intensive computation and therefore consumes a large amount of DSP power and memory. The full decode - to PCM in cases of voice or YUV in video--and subsequent re-encode is highly inefficient and reduces the number of channels that can be transcoded using a computational resource such as a DSP.

- Marwan Jabri

Founder and Chief Technology Officer

- Harish Gandhi

Senior Product Marketing Manager

Dilithium Networks Inc.





Article Comments - Design hits media standards wall
Comments:??
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:
?
?
Webinars

Seminars

Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

?
?
Back to Top