Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
EE Times-Asia > Processors/DSPs

New option for processor tools

Posted: 14 Oct 2004 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:signal processing? general purpose processor? dsp? tool? third party?

Bier: Differences in tools are a central consideration when choosing between a digital signal processor and a general-purpose processor.

Signal-processing applications are becoming more complicated, and so are the processors that run them. As a result, application developers rely on compilers and other tools more heavily than ever. This has made tools a decisive factor in processor-selection decisions.

Indeed, differences in tools are a central consideration when choosing between a digital signal processor (DSP) and a general-purpose processor (GPP).

DSP vendors often take a go-it-alone approach when it comes to tools. In many cases, the only toolset available for a DSP is the vendor's internally developed toolset.

In contrast, GPP vendors often pay two or more third-party tool vendors to develop toolsets. And if the processor is popular enough, tool providers will develop tools on their own initiative. As a result, developers using typical GPPs can choose from a wide selection of tools.

Although it expands users' choices, paying a third-party vendor to develop tools has some disadvantages. The processor vendor has a uniquely deep understanding of the processor; and is also likely to have a superior understanding of its target applications and its customers' needs. Both types of knowledge enable the processor vendor to optimize the tools in ways that third-party vendors would not, and to include useful features that third-party vendors would not include. This is particularly true for DSP vendors, whose processors, target applications and customers are typically specialized in some way.

On the other hand, there is little room for differentiation in generic tool components such as the compiler front-end, and processor vendors usually have no special expertise in such components. For those components, third-party offerings are often superiorand tool providers can often create the components faster than the processor vendor can.

Given these trade-offs, it is not surprising that a few processor vendors are now mixing elements from the two approaches. In this hybrid approach, the processor vendor develops the tool components that benefit most from processor- and application-specific optimizations such as the compiler back-end. Meanwhile, the third-party vendor focuses on the more generic components such as the compiler front-end.

As tools become more important, processor vendors targeting signal-processing applications must take a hard look at their tool-development strategies. Ideally, their tools should offer the specialized features traditionally associated with DSP tools and the broad range of options associated with GPP tools. For many, the best way to achieve both goals will be a hybrid approach.

Jeff Bier

General Manager

Berkeley Design Technology Inc.

- BDTI's Kenton Williston contributed to this column

Article Comments - New option for processor tools
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:


Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

Back to Top