Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
EE Times-Asia > RF/Microwave

IEEE 802.20 working group revises voting procedure

Posted: 20 Jul 2007 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:IEEE 802.20 working group? voting procedure? WiMAX?

In response to allegations that Qualcomm Inc. and IEEE 802.20 working group members have tried to "stuff the ballot" by bringing additional employees and contractors to key meetings, the IEEE's 802.20 Executive Committee and the related Oversight Committee have changed the working group's procedures to "one entity, one vote."

The working group went on hiatus a year ago for a three-month "cooling off period," after Intel Corp. and Motorola Inc. threatened to file formal complaints over working group irregularities. Former 802.20 chairman Jerry Upton resigned, after many members suggested that he was working in Qualcomm's interest, though he was an independent contractor.

The 802.20 Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Working Group was working on concepts for broadband access that could allow multimegabit services from higher speed vehicles than 802.16 WiMAX. Many proposals were based on concepts similar to Flarion Inc.'s "flash OFDM" (Flarion was later acquired by Qualcomm). Independent observers wondered if the working group was being eclipsed by 802.16e, the mobile version of WiMAX. What's more, the hiatus has not helped the industry's perception that interest in 802.20 may be difficult to restart.

Traditionally, 802 working groups have operated under a "one person, one vote" structure, but sources in Ethernet and Personal Area Networks (PAN) working groups questioned, off the record, why the 802 LAN/WAN group does not adopt the single-entity model for all its working groups. Under this model, an entity could be a corporation, school, development group, coalition or any institution interested in participation.

"There's been a running concern about the role of the truly independent contractor. Does a move to single-entity shut out the independent engineer?" a source in the 802.3 community asked. "But on top of this concern, I think the IEEE is just dreading the bureaucratic nightmare of making this shift for 802 at large. Standardizing a new voting approach might make the most sense, but the easiest path might be addressing it [one] working group at a time."

- Loring Wirbel
EE Times

Article Comments - IEEE 802.20 working group revises vo...
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:


Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

Back to Top