Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
?
EE Times-Asia > Manufacturing/Packaging
?
?
Manufacturing/Packaging??

Chip R&D treads shaky ground

Posted: 01 Sep 2008 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:intellectual property control? embedded? multicore? R&D initiatives?

Amid continued debate on whether semiconductor R&D is an endangered species or is successfully evolving to adapt to changing realities, Intermolecular Inc. and Semiconductor Research Corp. braved the debacle, with each announcing their own R&D initiatives. Intermolecular reported on a memory R&D pilot line, while SRC described emerging programs in analog, energy, medical and multicore.

The IC industry still pours billions of dollars annually into R&D. But in recent years, as costs have skyrocketed, chipmakers have been outsourcing more of their R&D requirementswith implications for intellectual property controlto consortia, silicon foundries and third-party vendors. Some observers fear the trends portend a distant scenario in which the vast majority of chipmakers cease R&D, relegating the once-mighty industry to a service sector populated by branding houses.

Meanwhile, some chipmakers that have outsourced their R&D are reportedly dissatisfied with the payback. And some critics are questioning whether emerging R&D collaboration models are workable.

'Applications research'
SRC is among the believers in the collaborative model. Founded in 1982, the consortium is spearheading several R&D initiatives. One is the Nanoelectronics Research Initiative, which has a 15-year goal of demonstrating novel devices with critical dimensions below 10nm. SRC is also expanding its efforts in "applications research." Furthermore, SRC is setting up an Analog Design Center, which will explore analog and mixed-signal technologies across "a broad spectrum of applications," said Larry Sumney, president and CEO at SRC. And a program still on the drawing board, the Topical Research Collaboration, will initially address energy and medical research through two separate projects.

Intermolecular, too, is expanding its charter. In 2007, it made a splash by rolling out the High-Productivity Combinatorial platform, which provides several process steps in various cluster tools. HPC is said to facilitate R&D of IC materials, processes and device structures. The company can sell the cluster tools to chipmakers for R&D purposes. It has also set up an R&D line within its own facilities. Now, Intermolecular has set up an R&D pilot line for use in developing a range of emerging memory technologies, such as phase-change memory and resistive RAM. The company is also mulling plans to develop similar technologies in the 3D chip and solar markets, said David Lazovsky, Intermolecular CEO.

Business is booming at Intermolecular, which logged $55 million in bookings in 2007. One of its customers conducts no R&D in-house, having designated Intermolecular as its R&D arm. Companies like Intermolecular have "changed the landscape," Lazovsky said.

Few would argue the point, though some would call the shift troubling.

Losing viability
Chip R&D "is not dead; it's still going on," said Dean Freeman, an analyst with Gartner Inc. But "as costs continue to escalate and R&D becomes more difficult, Gartner expects a greater percentage of R&D to be outsourced."

Some aspects of the in-house R&D model may simply be no longer viable. Many chipmakers still use high-volume manufacturing tools and fabs to conduct R&D, Lazovsky noted, adding that the industry can no longer afford to "use yesterday's methodologies for today's challenges."

The shifting environment has been a bonanza for R&D outsource entities. Along with Intermolecular and SRC, groups such as Albany Nanotech, IBM Corp.'s technology alliance, Europe's Interuniversity Microelectronics Center, Japan consortium Semiconductor Leading Edge Technologies (Selete), International Sematech and SVTC Technologies LLC all report booming activity.

Chipmakers are scrambling to find the right R&D partners, since not even the likes of IBM Corp. and Intel Corp. can afford to do it alone in the current environment. In total, semiconductor R&D costs are expected to double from $50 billion in 2007 to $100 billion by 2012, according to Intermolecular.

The R&D cost for a single semiconductor company to develop a 45nm process is $1.5 billion, according to Gartner. The firm expects R&D costs to rise 15 percent to 25 percent at the 32nm node.

Outsourced activitites
On average, the IC industry still spends 12 percent to 15 percent of total sales on R&D. But that figure is somewhat misleading, as vendors continue to outsource more pieces of the puzzle.

The acceleration of R&D outsourcing activity has been particularly acute for technologies that could advance Moore's Law, Freeman said. They include carbon nanotubes, heterogeneous ICs, high-k/metal-gate technology and non-planar devices such as FinFETs.

One high-profile case of R&D outsourcing was Texas Instruments Inc.'s decision to cease its digital R&D efforts and hand the task to foundry partner Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. TI now focuses on in-house analog R&D.

Advanced Micro Devices, Freescale Semiconductor, Intel, NXP Semiconductors, Toshiba, Samsung, STMicroelectronics and many others are also relying more on outside sources for R&D.

Some pundits predict a radical consolidation of the IC industry. Freeman sees the industry boiling down to a handful of R&D/manufacturing clusters: IBM's technology alliance, Intel and TSMC. There may be room for three or four memory makers, he said. Analog is a different story; several companies could survive the storm, he believes.

IP issues
As R&D responsibility is shifted to other parties, some question whether intellectual property control will follow. Outsourcing critics have hit the panic button as more IP has been funneled to Asia, especially China, given the country's poor track record for IP rights protection.

But it's a moot point whether IP "is going offshore or not," argued Sumney, because "the semiconductor industry itself is global."

Until the 1980s, semiconductor R&D was driven by giants such as Bell Laboratories, General Electric, IBM and Xerox Parc. The golden era of semiconductor R&D ended some 20 years ago, when the U.S. government forced the breakup of AT&T, which owned Bell Labs. The research organization could no longer do research for research's sake and never fully recovered, Freeman said.

Around the same time, chipmakers, which had historically handled the bulk of their R&D efforts in-house, began to find the investment burdensome. Consortia were launched to enable collaborative R&D.

Other R&D models followed. IBM formed a technology alliance with chipmakers to offset R&D costs. Later, silicon foundries jumped into the fray.

Now, specialty R&D service providers such as Intermolecular, SVTC and a slew of niche players are entering the mix. Many promise the ability to bring technologies "from the lab to the fab."

Under scrutiny
Each R&D model seems to have its advantages and its share of detractors. For example, said Freeman, chip-making consortium Sematech was formed "for the common good," but "it didn't always work that way."

Alliances have had their problems as well. Crolles2, the high-profile joint R&D venture of Freescale, NXP, ST and TSMC, last year saw Freescale bail out of the venture and join IBM's technology alliance, while NXP, a founding member when it was part of Philips, left the group and aligned itself with TSMC.

Meanwhile, according to sources, IBM technology alliance member AMD has been privately grousing that it has seen insufficient payback on the soaring IP fees. An AMD spokesman, however, said those repeating the rumors were "barking up the wrong tree" and that there was no merit to the reports.

Others believe that only an elite group of companies can sustain R&D in a consortium or foundry. "Doing development in a foundry is cost-prohibitive," said David Bergeron, CEO of R&D foundry vendor SVTC, which has opened up a solar development center.

Sumney defended the consortium model but acknowledged that the consortia's challenge is to balance the research needs of their membership. For example, he said, as companies have gone fabless or fab-lite, their R&D focus has shifted from advancing Moore's Law to conducting "applications research" in a particular discipline.

- Mark LaPedus
EE Times





Article Comments - Chip R&D treads shaky ground
Comments:??
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:
?
?
Webinars

Seminars

Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

?
?
Back to Top