Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
EE Times-Asia > Optoelectronics/Displays

Health issues spur need for 3D TV refinements

Posted: 05 May 2010 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:3D TV? 3D health issue? virtual reality?

Engineering refinements to 3D TV technology could be required if even a small percentage of users suffer from health problems related to viewing 3D TV, according to Jannick Rolland, a professor at the University of Central Florida's School of Optics.

While most viewers of the 3D TVs being rolled out there is year should suffer no adverse reactions to the technology, there have been very few short-term studies!and no long-term studies!on the technology, according to Rolland.

Last month, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd issued a warning about possible health effects associated with 3D TV, including altered vision, lightheadedness and even stroke or epileptic seizure. Researchers from the University of California at Berkeley and the University of Washington have published papers finding that visual disparities in 3D TV images can cause physical strain in viewers.

"I applaud the 3D TV makers for introducing this new technology, because right away they are going to get both criticism and accolades," said Rolland. "It's like news!people are looking for drama, but that is not the point. The point is the vision; 3D TV will happen, no matter what, we'll just have to wait and see how people are affected."

Rolland helped pioneer virtual reality (VR), which uses head-mounted displays to completely immerse users into a 3D world. Today she focuses on "augmented reality" which, instead of full immersion, just overlays additional information on the real world, such as adding X-ray imagery over a patient's skin, showing surgeons where to make incisions.

VR ultimately failed in the marketplace because engineers could not recreate all the necessary visual cues for full immersion in a device that consumers could afford. 3D TV sidesteps the immersion issue by not attempting to recreate all the cues necessary for a head-mounted device, where a user's viewpoint changes when they turn their head, instead just recreating the separate perspective cues for the left and right eyes at a single viewpoint.

"The difference between VR and 3D TV is that it does not entail the full immersion of the user, since there is no head-mounted display," said Rolland. But many questions remain regarding the one-size-fits all approach that has to be taken for mass audiences to enjoy 3D experience, according to Rolland. For instance, can the 3D glasses accommodate an interocular distance between eyes that is much less or more than average? Will adaption to visual disparities interfere with vision after a movie? Will extended exposure permanently change brain functions in unsupervised children who watch for hours on end? To find out the answers some labs are doing research, but the industry is marching forward regardless.

The Entertainment Technology Center (ETC) at the University of Southern California will research reports from consumers regarding adverse reactions, over the next year as 3D TVs enter the mainstream.

"I think it will be safe," said Rolland. "It's challenging, but I think developers are on the right track!it's just a matter of finding the best implementation. 3D TV is such fantastic technology that it is going to succeed, but you are using your eyes in a different way than you do in the real world!you are focusing and converging your eyes at different locations, which could put a strain on your eyes if the system is not well implemented," said Rolland.

1???2?Next Page?Last Page

Article Comments - Health issues spur need for 3D TV re...
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:


Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

Back to Top