Transformations of board design landscape beyond 10G
Keywords:802.3ap Backplane Ethernet? 10GBase-KR? 40/100G?
Although 10GBase-KR is a single-channel copper backplane operating at 10.3125 Gbit/s, the ease in implementing four channels has led some system vendors to look upon the single-channel backplane as the ideal stepping-stone for four-channel 40G Ethernet implementations. In the near future, experience gained in 10-Gbit multiple channels will allow 10-channel 100G Ethernet, supported by the current C form-factor pluggable (CFP) and extended-capability pluggable (CXP) modules. Eventually, the availability of faster chip-level transceivers and experience with faster board-level channels will allow four-channel 100G Ethernet, with each channel supporting up to 28 Gbit/s (25 Gbits plus forward error correction overhead). That standard will use the emerging CFP2 multisource agreement (CFP2 MSA) module.
But there are speed bumps on the path to ubiquitous 40G and 100G Ethernet. Network equipment developers who worked with 10G Sonet/OTN or first-generation 10G Ethernet design have experienced firsthand how difficult the maintenance of signal quality can be as backplanes move from 2 or 3 Gbit/s to 10 Gbit/s. The discontinuities brought about by high-speed signal integrity challenges have a pronounced impact on the choice of pc board substrate materials and board layout methodology.
Although EDA tools for both simulation and place-and-route have improved significantly in the past two decades, the system designer must play an active role in ensuring high-speed signal fidelity at both the device and board levels simultaneously. On a lower level of discrete devices, system designers must be fully cognizant of the equalization and error-correction parameters of individual chips, particularly the receivers and transmitters in the high-speed paths.
At the same time, however, the board-level designer must keep in mind the implications of the layout of high-speed traces (including vias), edge rates and planar discontinuities. Unless the whole-system approach is kept paramount, planning for such contingencies can amount to a game of Whac-A-Mole: Optimize a design for one transceiver channel, and unacceptable compromises pop up elsewhere.
Physical layout of the board must take into account via stubs' potential for significantly degrading signal integrity. Backdrilling is highly recommended to mitigate the unwanted high-frequency resonances caused by via stubs. Board layout can also be affected by the type of data encoding used by physical-layer and PHY/MAC combo chips.
If devices are laid out randomly, with little concern for trace positioning, signals can be subject to high-frequency crosstalk and impedance discontinuities, which cannot always be alleviated through equalization.
Isolated traces
As a starting point in design, traces should be properly isolated by spacing them at least three dielectric thicknesses from one another. As simulation and real-time network tests take place, the eye diagrams for signals should be monitored in real-time using test equipment intended for multigigabit speeds.
Planar discontinuities are likely to be encountered. The best defenses are proper signal termination and a board layout that is as straightforward and unencumbered as possible. Discontinuities can propagate through a design, however, when multilayer boards are used with multiple vias, via stubs and surface-mount components. The higher the number of devices with fast transmission edge rates, particularly surface-mount devices, the greater the discontinuity problem can become.
Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.