Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
?
EE Times-Asia > RF/Microwave
?
?
RF/Microwave??

Review of wireless connectivity protocols for embedded systems

Posted: 18 Sep 2012 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:protocol? network resiliency? Home Area Networks?

Wireless is everywhere! This mantra is not new, but perhaps is taking on invigorated meaning with the explosion of wireless devices in seemingly every application space where embedded systems are deployed.

Driven by our insatiable need for information and the desire for finer control over every resource of value, it seems everything is becoming connected, and much of it is being done wirelessly. Fortunately today, adding wireless connectivity has never been easier.

In this article I'll introduce wireless terminology and basic design considerations, explain popular connectivity options such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, ZigBee and others, and examine hardware and software tradeoffs, including design strategies, for easily and quickly incorporating wireless connectivity into an embedded design.

Wireless considerations
The first, and sometimes most difficult, decision to make when incorporating wireless is selecting which protocol to use. The protocol selection can have implications of interoperability (or not) with other products, which could even be supplied by a competitor.

On the other hand, a proprietary protocol could restrict access to a product-set under your control if you can forego the wider market for interoperable products. Additionally, some proprietary protocols can provide a solution tuned to specific performance parameters like simplicity, network resiliency or security.

Figure: Different networks have different priorities.

Which frequency bands to use is often determined by market requirements, especially with the larger industry alliances like Wi-Fi. But the choice of frequency bands can be a tradeoff with propagation range; wherin doubling the frequency halves the range. It can also be a tradeoff with power consumption and over-the-air data rate.

In the U.S., the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has set aside portions of the RF spectrum as designated Industrial-Scientific-Medical (ISM) bands, which are unlicensed and unrestricted, meaning they are open for anyone to use without requiring a license. However, these frequencies are not unregulated. All products which intentionally radiate in these frequency bands must pass certification testing to demonstrate that emissions are within the limits prescribed by CFR Part 15.

Unlicensed bands vary from country to country, so products designed for worldwide distribution will also have to address the certification requirements imposed by the governments of their ultimate destination. The unlicensed 2.4GHz band is particularly unique in that it's an unlicensed band nearly worldwide C the primary reason for its popular use as the frequency band used by Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.

Another important consideration is the topology needed by the network. Star topologies are an aggregation of point-to-point links, with a central master node that manages a fixed number of slave nodes and serves as the conduit for all upstream communication. Master nodes can also link with other master nodes to extend a star network into various configurations, sometimes called tree or cluster-tree networks. Wi-Fi and Bluetooth use the star topology.

1???2???3?Next Page?Last Page



Article Comments - Review of wireless connectivity prot...
Comments:??
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:
?
?
Webinars

Seminars

Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

?
?
Back to Top