Global Sources
EE Times-Asia
Stay in touch with EE Times Asia
EE Times-Asia > EDA/IP

Google voices further support for Samsung in patent case

Posted: 24 Apr 2014 ?? ?Print Version ?Bookmark and Share

Keywords:Apple? Samsung? Google? patent? infringement?

It came as no surprise that Google guaranteed its support for Samsung against some of Apple's claims in the patent infringement lawsuit being tried in federal court. Google's Android OS powers the South Korean firms' mobile devices so it is obvious that both companies will back each other.

The discovery came right before the start of Apple's rebuttal case when Judge Koh allowed Apple's lead lawyer Harold McElhinny to read for the jury a Samsung document stating the company had no such agreement with anyone and then play a somewhat tortured deposition of Google's chief counsel James Maccoun revealing the opposite.

This move was clearly yet another attempt to create an appearance of Samsung's questionable intentions and motives. Earlier in day Apple lawyer William Lee, working along the same lines, questioned Samsung's damages expert, James Kearl, about the reasons behind the company's spending $4 million to attempt to prove its $6 million claim against Apple.

The parties have run out of time on Judge Koh's stern stopwatch. Samsung is only allowed 11 remaining minutes for examination of rebuttal witnesses, while Apple has 38 minutes remaining. Testimony in front of the jury will therefore clearly conclude on Friday.

The eight jurors are likely to have gone home dizzy after a whirlwind day that, in addition to the indemnity disclosure, involved topics ranging from video capture modules, shared libraries, and linked actions, to an Apple engineer sharing the birth of his daughter with his mother-in-law in Texas via Facetime.

Samsung attorneys used the morning session to lay out their own patent infringement case against Apple with expert witness testimony. As expected, Apple's experts in defence found no infringement. They contended that Samsung's patents are old enough to have run out by now, and they describe clunky devices of the 1990s that do not apply to the far more complex Apple devices of today.

To that end, James Storer, professor of computer science at Brandeis University, described for the jury his detailed evaluation of the Samsung patents and explained how they place no limitations on Apple's modern products. Two Apple engineers closely involved with iPhone and iPad projects claimed no knowledge of the patents or deliberate infringement. Instead they painted a picture of a product evolution from within their company.

For the rebuttal, Apple brought back some of its earlier expert witnesses who all staunchly defended their previous positions regarding Samsung's infringements and disagreed with every critique leveled against them. Such strong disagreements on highly technical issues are likely to present a particularly difficult challenge for the jury, particularly since the streams of lawyers working the case appear to court watchers to be formidably challenged by the technologies involved.

The jury is expected to get their instructions from Judge Koh on Monday morning with final arguments by attorneys in the afternoon.

- Magnus Thordarson
??EE Times

Article Comments - Google voices further support for Sa...
*? You can enter [0] more charecters.
*Verify code:


Visit Asia Webinars to learn about the latest in technology and get practical design tips.

Back to Top